Wealth Management

Is Diversification Dead?

By Matthew D. Palazzolo February 01, 2017
Is Diversification Dead?

It’s not surprising that many US-based investors are questioning the wisdom of portfolio diversification. A well-diversified, balanced portfolio of multiple asset classes and geographies has underperformed a simple, US-only, balanced portfolio of stocks and bonds for several years. But go back further, and diversification was very beneficial to performance or, at worst, neutral, as the Display shows.

Perhaps their question should be: Will the future be more like the recent past or the distant past?

The answer will depend on how the future differs from the last few years. A new president in the US, elections across Europe and countless other geopolitical events create uncertainty—but 2016 was full of uncertainty and surprises, too. That’s not necessarily different.

What is potentially different is the market backdrop. Over the last few years, low global growth and extraordinary global monetary policy have been the two main factors that have kept the status quo intact.

There’s good reason to believe both of these issues have reached a tipping point: Global nominal growth may be headed higher, and interest rates are likely to follow. Add in elevated equity valuations in the US, and we think the prudent allocation decision over the next few years is to diversify portfolios by geography (owning securities from outside the US) and by asset class. We believe owning other asset classes will serve as a protective hedge, as well as provide uncorrelated sources of return in an increasingly disparate market environment.

Beyond diversification, there are two elements that are important to keep in mind.

First, markets, environments, and risks change, so it’s important to remain adaptive and flexible in your asset allocation. This means being willing to adjust allocations at the margin with the goal of providing a smoother, more predictable return experience, as well as adding to strategic allocations, when research indicates it would be beneficial. For example, in 2016, we increased our strategic exposure to small-cap stocks in both US and non-US portfolios, which we believe can augment absolute and relative return over time.

Second, markets ebb and flow over time. Despite recent modest returns, diversified balanced accounts achieved the returns we thought most likely five years ago, because most markets had strong returns early in the five-year period, which offset more modest returns in 2015 and 2016.

That’s the point—a portfolio will never achieve the expected return every single year. But by averaging the good and less good, clients can stay on plan and achieve their goals.

Investors who remain diversified, flexible and patient will be well prepared to handle whatever surprises an uncertain future holds.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice, or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams.

Is Diversification Dead?
Back to a top