<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Housing Finance: Is Government Involvement Necessary?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.alliancebernstein.com/index.php/2012/01/13/us-housing-finance-is-government-involvement-necessary/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.alliancebernstein.com/index.php/2012/01/13/us-housing-finance-is-government-involvement-necessary/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=us-housing-finance-is-government-involvement-necessary</link>
	<description>The AllianceBernstein Blog on Investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:20:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheldon Jacobson</title>
		<link>http://blog.alliancebernstein.com/index.php/2012/01/13/us-housing-finance-is-government-involvement-necessary/#comment-1419</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheldon Jacobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alliancebernstein.com/?p=1277#comment-1419</guid>
		<description>The government is always a convenient scapegoat. When all is well, they only interfere (Rubin,1998 re: Chinese wall).  Perhaps, some day mankind will be perfect. Complexity (Manhattan project) and cupidity will always be with us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The government is always a convenient scapegoat. When all is well, they only interfere (Rubin,1998 re: Chinese wall).  Perhaps, some day mankind will be perfect. Complexity (Manhattan project) and cupidity will always be with us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Boyle</title>
		<link>http://blog.alliancebernstein.com/index.php/2012/01/13/us-housing-finance-is-government-involvement-necessary/#comment-1395</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alliancebernstein.com/?p=1277#comment-1395</guid>
		<description>This question reminds me of an old story about the Soviet Union (some of you may remember that institution).

Two women are waiting in line at a Moscow store one day, to buy bread. The line is a long one: in Moscow under the USSR, the length of lines to buy basic foodstuffs was legendary (and that&#039;&#039;s when you could get them at all).

One woman, forgetting herself, says to the other, &quot;It&#039;&#039;s an outrage that we should have to wait so long, just to buy bread! Does this happen in the West?&quot;

The other woman sharply corrects her comrade: &quot;It&#039;&#039;s a privilege that the government provides us with bread! Did you know that, in the West, the government doesn&#039;&#039;t even MAKE bread?&quot;

And, indeed, it doesn&#039;&#039;t. We have bread - plentiful bread - without the need for government intervention. This is a complex supply chain, too, not by any means trivial (just try centrally planning it). 

If you cut the government out of financing housing, then yes, it will take the market some time to adapt. It will take it years, maybe decades, to fine-tune itself. But it will do it, and very likely better than it&#039;&#039;s been done so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This question reminds me of an old story about the Soviet Union (some of you may remember that institution).</p>
<p>Two women are waiting in line at a Moscow store one day, to buy bread. The line is a long one: in Moscow under the USSR, the length of lines to buy basic foodstuffs was legendary (and that&#8221;s when you could get them at all).</p>
<p>One woman, forgetting herself, says to the other, &#8220;It&#8221;s an outrage that we should have to wait so long, just to buy bread! Does this happen in the West?&#8221;</p>
<p>The other woman sharply corrects her comrade: &#8220;It&#8221;s a privilege that the government provides us with bread! Did you know that, in the West, the government doesn&#8221;t even MAKE bread?&#8221;</p>
<p>And, indeed, it doesn&#8221;t. We have bread &#8211; plentiful bread &#8211; without the need for government intervention. This is a complex supply chain, too, not by any means trivial (just try centrally planning it). </p>
<p>If you cut the government out of financing housing, then yes, it will take the market some time to adapt. It will take it years, maybe decades, to fine-tune itself. But it will do it, and very likely better than it&#8221;s been done so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel Dawson</title>
		<link>http://blog.alliancebernstein.com/index.php/2012/01/13/us-housing-finance-is-government-involvement-necessary/#comment-1182</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel Dawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alliancebernstein.com/?p=1277#comment-1182</guid>
		<description>Government rules such as those requiring full and understandable disclosure of financing terms make sense.  On the other hand, Government intervention such as loan guarantees warp the system.  As we have witnessed, government attempts to have more citizens buy homes simply put many people in homes they could not afford.  The government supposedly is for the benefit of all of us, but who among us would have voted to buy our neighbors a home using our money (taxes).  Too much government always seem to cause unintended consequences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Government rules such as those requiring full and understandable disclosure of financing terms make sense.  On the other hand, Government intervention such as loan guarantees warp the system.  As we have witnessed, government attempts to have more citizens buy homes simply put many people in homes they could not afford.  The government supposedly is for the benefit of all of us, but who among us would have voted to buy our neighbors a home using our money (taxes).  Too much government always seem to cause unintended consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
